Content Issues |
The work of the Forum is not solely geared to technical issues. Content is a large part of its work. It is important that the Forum does have this dual emphasis, so that both connectivity and content issues can be tackled side-by-side. The work is being led by Paul Ayris for Higher Education, by Veronica Frazer when she was NHS Library Advisor, and now by Ben Toth, Director of the National Knowledge Service (NKS).
| Users First: removing barriers to knowledge access across HE and the NHS |
The project was jointly commissioned by Paul Ayris, Director of Library Services, UCL (representing Higher Education) and Veronica Fraser, NHS Library Advisor (representing DoH Information Policy Unit) as part of the work programme identified by the NHS/HE Forum, with the NHS/HE Forum Content Group acting as a Project Steering Group.
Funding for the project was provided by JISC, SCONUL, LLIDU and IPU/IA funds.
Background to the Project
There is a considerable flow of people and funding between the NHS and HE covering research contracts, provision of services, consultants and other staff who have joint contracts of employment and "workers who are learning and learners who are working". Although many of these staff require access to both NHS and HE e-resources from work and home, the existing networks have not been able to facilitate this.
In an attempt to meet users' needs, the NHS and HEIs are providing 24-hour access to e-journals and databases that can be accessed from work and increasingly from home. However for some, access is being provided to the same key resources (e.g. journal titles via both the NHS and JANET) whilst others have no access at all.
The NHS/HE Forum was established to review the barriers to effective access to knowledge sources across HE/FE and the NHS. The Forum itself has focussed on identifying technical solutions to access problems between the academic network, JANET, and the NHS network, NHSnet.
Technical solutions look likely to resolve many of the issues over the next few years. However, this by itself will not automatically improve knowledge access as members of the Forum have also identified significant other barriers that impede staff and students who work, teach and learn or for other contractual reasons have need to access information. These include:
This study explores the above issues through interviews with key stakeholders and a subsequent consultation with the wider HE/NHS constituency.
The main output of the Content Group was the Users First Report, commissioned by the Content Group.
"Users First: removing barriers to knowledge access across HE and NHS" -Final Report -June 2003 by John Thornhill BA MCLIP Library & Information Consultant
The content Group drew up a generic presentation, which was used in a number of fora to disseminate the contents of the Report.
The Report appeared in June 2003 and made a number of recommendations for practical ways forward. Using the recommendations in the Report, the Content Group drew up an Action Plan consisting of the following areas of work:
NHS-HE Content Group Activity Plan June 2003-Summer 2004 |
A number of lines of action proceeded based on this Action Plan.
Within the NHS, the Content Group saw an increasing emphasis on modernization and making better use of IT and Information Literacy programmes such as the National Programme for IT (NPfIT) and the National Knowledge Service.
Within Higher Education, University Libraries were seen to be increasingly trying to work with the NHS to provide pathways for the common use of information resources purchased across the NHS and HE. In librarianship, professionals were and are concerned to promote information literacy and the development of collections available in networked environments.
All such developments led the NHS-HE Content Group to invite the JISC and the NHS jointly to fund two Invitations to Tender, action lines 7 and 8 in the above list, for An Information Literacy Skills Pathway for Health, and a User Needs Analysis for the UK NHS and NHS/Higher Education Interface
The Content Group believed that the two projects would:
Unhappily, funding for the two ITTs was not forthcoming and this effectively marked the end of the first phase of activity for the NHS-HE Content Group.
Structures revised 2004 |
The failure of the two bids to fund the ITTs co-incided with a review by SCONUL (Society of College, National and University Libraries) of its ACOSC - Advisory Committee on Health Services. In 2004, this Committee was restructured as a high-level strategic body to interact with Government, the NHS and HE. Two Chairs have since led this body forward, with representation from HE and the NHS, Judith Palmer of Oxford University and Maggie Haines of King's College London.
The Forum's NHS-HE Content Group was given two places on this body and the representatives are Paul Ayris (HE) and Ben Toth (NHS). Additionally, the Content Group looked for alliances with truly cross-sectoral groups within the four home countries, to enable it to continue its work within the Forum.
One truly cross-sectoral body, of which the Content Group is a member, is the M25 Consortium's London Health Libraries grouping. See website: M25 Consortium of Academic Libraries
Scholarly Communication issues |
The re-alignment of the work and outreach of the Content Group also co-incided with the publication of Dr Ian Gibson's Parliamentary Report Scientific Publications: Free for All? in July 2004. The objective of this influential Report was to look at the current state of scholarly publishing and at drivers for change within the existing infrastructures. In particular, recommendation 9 was of particular importance:
We recommend that the Joint Information Systems Committee and the NHS work together to implement joint procurement procedures that reflect the close working patterns of NHS and the higher education sector and represent value for money for both. (Paragraph 36).
The JISC takes the joint procurement agenda forward 2004-05 |
The Parliamentary Report was very influential, particularly in Higher Education. The JISC approached Paul Ayris, as co-Chair of the NHS-HE Content Group, to see how the recommendation of Dr Gibson's Report could be taken forward. The result of this discussion was the reformulation of the Content Group as the current JISC NHS-HE Procurement Group, to take forward recommendations 3, 10 and 11 of the Users First Report, under the aegis of the Parliamentary Report on Scholarly Communication issues.
The reformulation of the Forum's Content Group was successful. Still part of the NHS-HE Forum, the Content Group was now allied to a national Parliamentary Report, to the cross-sectoral SCONUL Health Strategy Group and to cross-sectoral Groups such as the M25 Consortium's London Health Libraries. The Content Group, under the new aegis of the JISC's NHS-HE Procurement Group, began in earnest to plan the joint procurement of two pieces of content between the NHS and HE - one piece of content from an Open Access publisher and one from a traditional commercial publisher. In the course of this work, a joint licence was developed by HE and NHS representatives to be used in the procurement activity. This forms one of the outputs of the Group in this new mode of working.
After extensive discussion, two pieces of content were identified for this procurement - membership of the PLoS (Public Library of Science) and content from one commercial publisher. In the summer of 2005, it became apparent that a cross-sectoral agreement for membership of PLoS between the JISC and NHS England, through the National Knowledge Service, and NHS Wales was possible and this is indeed going ahead.
No agreement was possible over the joint procurement of the commercial content between the JISC and the NKS. Why was this so? A number of reasons and issues were identified:
Future activity 2006 |
The NHS-HE Procurement Group of the NHS-HE Forum is determined to build on the learning it has gathered, and disseminated, since the formation of the Forum in 2001. The joint membership deal for PLoS shows what can be done when both NHS and HE sectors work together. Four further pieces of joint work are planned for 2006: